{"id":4344,"date":"2005-04-24T14:04:16","date_gmt":"2005-04-24T14:04:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:8000\/\/?p=4344"},"modified":"2026-02-21T20:49:34","modified_gmt":"2026-02-21T20:49:34","slug":"my-life-so-far-by-jane-fonda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peter.murmann.me\/?p=4344","title":{"rendered":"\u201cMy Life so Far\u201d by Jane Fonda"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"image\"<\/a><\/div>\n

MAUREEN DOWD has written a funny review of Jane Fonda\u2019s autobiography in today\u2019s NYT. <\/i><\/p>\n

\u2018My Life So Far\u2019: The Roles of a Lifetime <\/b><\/a><\/p>\n

One day when she was playing cowgirl in the annual bison roundup on one of the New Mexico ranches of her husband, Ted Turner, Jane Fonda realized with a jolt that she was about to turn 60. She decided that the best way to meet this unnerving milestone was to make a short video of her life \u2018\u2018to discover its different themes.\u2019\u2018<\/p>\n

She invited her daughter, Vanessa Vadim, a documentary filmmaker, to help her. \u2018\u2018Why don\u2019t you just get a chameleon and let it crawl across the screen?\u2019\u2019 Vanessa suggested dryly.<\/p>\n

\u2018\u2018Ouch,\u2019\u2019 Jane writes. \u2018\u2018This was the rap on me: I\u2019ve had so many personae over my lifetime that it\u2019s easy to think, Who is she, anyway? Is there a \u2018there there\u2019? . . . When I looked at photos of myself over the years and matched them up with my husband of the time, I couldn\u2019t help feeling that maybe it was true\u2014maybe I simply become whatever the man I am with wants me to be: \u2018sex kitten,\u2019 \u2018controversial activist,\u2019 \u2018ladylike wife on the arm of corporate mogul.\u2019 . . . Was I just a chameleon, and if so, how was it that a seemingly strong woman could so thoroughly and repeatedly lose herself? Or had I really lost myself?\u2019\u2018<\/p>\n

\"image\"<\/a><\/div>\n

Fonda offers six decades\u2019 worth of exhaustive excavations into her lost and found selves. \u2018\u2018My Life So Far\u2019\u2019 is not a lyrical title, but it captures Jungian Jane\u2019s Sisyphean, Oprahphean struggle to process her pain and banish her demons. Her book is a psychobabble loop of \u2018\u2018tectonic shifting,\u2019\u2019 forfeiting her authenticity and feeling disembodied, then trying to reinhabit her body and \u2018\u2018own\u2019\u2019 her womanhood and her space and her vagina, her leadership and her wrinkles and her mother, so that her \u2018\u2018authentic self\u2019\u2019 can emerge; if the \u2018\u2018functioning self\u2019\u2019 and \u2018\u2018embodied self\u2019\u2019 could merge, she could fully engage with another fully authentic person in mutual affirmation, a whole being not overlapping into another being in a \u2018\u2018relational dance of patriarchy,\u2019\u2019 and live happily ever after in a \u2018\u2018shrinking, congested planet with diminishing resources and no vast, conquerable frontier to escape and expand into.\u2019\u2018<\/p>\n

And certainly no more of those tawdry threesomes!<\/p>\n

Her odyssey of self-discovery, with trendy incarnations from Parisian Barbarella to L.A. aerobics queen to born-again Georgian, leads to stilted and earnest pronouncements like: \u2018\u2018Sustainability in a relationship is as critical as it is in the environment.\u2019\u2018<\/p>\n

And: \u2018\u2018The subtle power of sexist roles and their inherent inequality has been deeply imprinted in all of us raised under them.\u2019\u2019 And this about finding God: \u2018\u2018It was more an experiencing of His presence, a psychic lucidity, that was allowing me access to something beyond consciousness. It wasn\u2019t long, however, before I found myself bumping up against certain literal, patriarchal aspects of Christian orthodoxy that I found difficult to embrace.\u2019\u2019 Duh.<\/p>\n

At first you think how much more readable her book would be if an editor had chopped out large chunks of ponderous psychic burrowing. But then you realize it all has to be in there, in her own voice. Otherwise, you wouldn\u2019t appreciate what a broken doll Jane Fonda is, how achingly poignant her story is and how much she\u2019s accomplished despite hideously dysfunctional parents who left her unable to comprehend or savor how smart and talented and pretty she was.<\/p>\n

Hollywood poured acid on her ego. In her first movie, \u2018\u2018Tall Story,\u2019\u2019 Jack Warner, the head of the studio, made her wear falsies, and the director, Joshua Logan, a family friend, suggested she consider having her jaw broken and reset and her back teeth pulled to create \u2018\u2018a more chiseled look.\u2019\u2018<\/p>\n

The vulnerable, yearning honesty that has made her such a powerful actress in Oscar-winning roles in \u2018\u2018Klute\u2019\u2019 and \u2018\u2018Coming Home\u2019\u2019 breaks through the therapy jargon. Her unrequited love story with her cold and brooding father, a man disgusted by displays of emotion or weakness, is Greek drama. She says she was trapped playing Athena to his Zeus. John McCain\u2019s heart might melt, and he might forgive Fonda her awful Hanoi Jane foolishness, if he were to read the portrait of this lonely little girl in pigtails who grew up in a \u2018\u2018Charles Addams-y\u2019\u2019 house in Greenwich, Conn., eating spinach and Spam, with no warmth or attention from a manic-depressive mother and a repressed father who flew into \u2018\u2018Protestant rages\u2019\u2019 and ignored his children in favor of his acting career and serial wives.<\/p>\n

At 9, she tried to share her dad\u2019s interest in reading: \u2018\u2018I got the novel \u2018Black Beauty\u2019 and sat in a chair opposite him. He hadn\u2019t acknowledged my presence, but when I came to a passage that made me want to laugh, instead of stifling the laughter I encouraged it, hoping he\u2019d ask me to share with him what was so funny. But he never looked up or said anything. It was as though I weren\u2019t even there.\u2019\u2018<\/p>\n

Her mother is an eerie, spectral figure, a sexy New York sophisticate who had been sexually abused as a child by the piano tuner; she disintegrates before her daughter\u2019s eyes, collecting and mounting butterflies or showing terrified Jane her botched breast surgery, leaving the confused little girl with the impression that it was her mother\u2019s fault that her dad was never around. \u2018\u2018I think it was around that time, maybe right there on that bed, that I vowed I would do whatever it took to be perfect so that a man would love me,\u2019\u2019 Fonda writes.<\/p>\n

After Henry Fonda asks for a divorce, her mother ends up in a straitjacket in an institution, coming home only to surreptitiously snatch a hidden razor she will use to slit her throat. On that day, her dad visits Connecticut long enough to sit 12-year-old Jane on his lap, tell her that her mother has died of a heart attack, arrange for a cremation and then return to New York to star in \u2018\u2018Mister Roberts\u2019\u2019 that night. \u2018\u2018Didn\u2019t miss a beat,\u2019\u2019 Fonda writes.<\/p>\n

With no one to talk to about her budding sexuality, Jane grew paranoid over the years that she was a boy in a girl\u2019s body. Failing to get her father\u2019s attention, she simply tried to inhabit him\u2014and perhaps one-up him. Henry Fonda was famous for characters who fought for social justice in \u2018\u201812 Angry Men,\u2019\u2019 \u2018\u2018The Ox-Bow Incident,\u2019\u2019 \u2018\u2018Young Mr. Lincoln\u2019\u2019 and \u2018\u2018Clarence Darrow,\u2019\u2019 so Jane Fonda wanted to be famous for it in real life. But even that backfired with her father, who scorned her activism and stopped speaking to her at times. \u2018\u2018I realized that if I wanted his attention, disapproval was the best I could hope for,\u2019\u2019 she writes. Besides, she was on the road so much, she ended up becoming an absentee parent just like her own. (In Jane jargon, she had a hard time breaking \u2018\u2018that cycle of disconnect.\u2019\u2018)<\/p>\n

She calls the chapter about her father dying \u2018\u2018Closure,\u2019\u2019 but she should have called it \u2018\u2018Gaping Wounds.\u2019\u2019 When she reports some bit of paternal iciness, her pain jitters off the page: \u2018\u2018Dad could spend hours stitching a needlepoint pattern he had designed or doing macrame baskets. . . . But to me, Dad was not a gentle person. He could be gentle with people he didn\u2019t know, utter strangers. Often I run into people who describe finding themselves sitting next to him on trans-Atlantic flights and go on about what an open person he was, how they drank and talked with him \u2018for eight hours nonstop.\u2019 It makes me angry. I never talked to him for 30 minutes nonstop!\u2019\u2018<\/p>\n

She says the only time her father referred to her looks was when he would send his wife to tell teenage Jane to wear a less revealing bathing suit or a looser belt; once she overheard him say her legs were too heavy. \u2018\u2018I went to bed and slept for two days, the only way I knew to escape those words that haunted me for the rest of my life,\u2019\u2019 she writes. Hating her body and face, she turned to anorexia, Dexedrine, diuretics and bulimia, calling purging \u2018\u2018somewhat orgasmic.\u2019\u2018<\/p>\n

Fonda offers fair and fascinating portraits of her three husbands.<\/p>\n

The French director Roger Vadim was a charming rogue, a compulsive gambler who ran through much of her inheritance from her mother. He turned Jane into Barbarella and denounced jealousy as \u2018\u2018bourgeois.\u2019\u2018<\/p>\n

\u2018\u2018Then one night he brought home a beautiful red-haired woman and took her into our bed with me,\u2019\u2019 the author writes. \u2018\u2018She was a high-class call girl employed by the well-known Madame Claude. It never occurred to me to object. I took my cues from him and threw myself into the threesome with the skill and enthusiasm of the actress that I am. . . . Sometimes there were three of us, sometimes more. Sometimes it was even I who did the soliciting.\u2019\u2019 The next morning, after Vadim had left, she would have coffee with the women as \u2018\u2018an antidote to objectification.\u2019\u2018<\/p>\n

Vadim, she says, \u2018\u2018knew how to validate only my facade.\u2019\u2019 She went into her radical chic phase, learning about black voting rights from Marlon Brando and the Vietnam War under the tutelage of Simone Signoret. \u2018\u2018Never underestimate what might be lying dormant beneath the surface of a back-combed blonde wearing false eyelashes,\u2019\u2019 she writes.<\/p>\n

After a \u2018\u2018deep hair epiphany,\u2019\u2019 she traded the blond mane for a brown shag and minis for jeans and jetted off to New Delhi on a solo search for inner truth\u2014even though she knew by leaving that she was not \u2018\u2018countenancing the personhood of my baby.\u2019\u2019 By the time she got back to the Beverly Wilshire, she was \u2018\u2018Jane of Arc,\u2019\u2019 as Vadim mockingly called her. Looking out the hotel window, she wondered, \u2018\u2018How could we live this way when there were New Delhis in the world?\u2019\u2018<\/p>\n

She divorced Vadim, sold her Biedermeier antiques and set up an apartment in downtown Los Angeles with her baby, wooden cable spools for tables, mattresses on the floor and beanbag chairs from the Salvation Army.<\/p>\n

She admits she was often humorless and defensive when she was working on her \u2018\u2018expanding consciousness as an activist\u2019\u2019 and confesses that as she watched her old taped interviews with her son, Troy, she wanted to shout, \u2018\u2018Will someone please tell her to shut up?\u2019\u2018<\/p>\n

She and Troy\u2019s father, Tom Hayden, met, not cute but causey. Having finished a book about how the Vietnam War paralleled American \u2018\u2018genocide\u2019\u2019 against Native Americans, he showed up at a slide show she had given about Vietnam. He was wearing a long braid and \u2018\u2018rubber sandals of the type I\u2019d been told the Vietnamese made out of the tires of abandoned U.S. vehicles,\u2019\u2019 and asked her for help with an art exhibit designed \u2018\u2018to show the Vietnamese as human beings.\u2019\u2019 Within days, they were making love on the living room floor.<\/p>\n

He tutored her on the Pentagon Papers and persuaded her to visit Hanoi, but did not go with the well-meaning but na\u00efve actress to save her from the gaffe that would haunt her forever — sitting on a North Vietnamese antiaircraft gun site.<\/p>\n

Wanting to live like ”the people,” Jane and Tom moved onto the second floor of a house in blue-collar Ocean Park with cockroaches and thin walls. She took their clothes to the Laundromat.<\/p>\n

Tom took the money Jane raised for his unsuccessful run for the United States Senate. He also apparently fooled around with the sexy baby sitter while his wife was off shooting ”Julia.” At a screening of ”Coming Home,” a film about Vietnam veterans that she developed, produced and starred in, he disdainfully stalked out, saying, ”Nice try.”<\/p>\n

Even though she started her wildly successful fitness business to support Hayden’s workers’ rights grass-roots organization, he saw it as ”an exercise in vanity.” After ”Coming Home” opened, Tom called Jane and her producing partners to a meeting to, as she writes, ”express his own barely suppressed rage over what he viewed as the injustice of a movie star receiving so much attention when the ‘real’ people . . . never get public credit.” The chi she had been building and endorphins she had been releasing in her workouts did not stop her from feeling worthless. ”By choosing denial,” she writes, ”I had permitted inferiority.” To Hayden’s credit, he told the two-time Oscar winner not to get fake breasts, but she ignored him.<\/p>\n

She produced ”On Golden Pond” to get her father the golden statuette he’d never won, but he still wouldn’t deign to discuss the scenes they shared in the movie. When she needs bracing during filming, she gets it from the highhanded and softhearted Kate Hepburn, who deemed Henry Fonda ”cold, cold, cold.” Jane collects the Oscar for him — ”the happiest moment of my life,” she writes — and brings it to him at home, as he was too ill to attend the ceremony. Sitting in his wheelchair, he does not say anything about it or thank her. She thinks she reads on his face that he is pleased. As he was dying, she sat with him hour after hour, happily massaging ”his beautiful, long, pale feet.”<\/p>\n

When she turned 51, Hayden announced he was in love with another woman. After her divorce, she got a cold call from a man whose voice was so booming she had to hold the phone away from her ear. Her portrait of Ted Turner leaps off the page, a hyperactive Rhett Butler in need of Ritalin, a man who buys ranches faster than Jane can pack her bags, a chauvinist, narcissistic boy-savant who bangs his head and fists against the wall when he realizes Jane loves Jesus as much as him.<\/p>\n

Turner, she says, was ”a 3-D stereophonic Shakespearean-level, sound-and-light show” who offered ”fountains-of-Versailles-and-fireworks sex.” On their first date he eagerly tells her, ”I have friends who are Communists,” adding, ”Gorbachev is my buddy and so is Castro.” He calls her for ”fonda-ling.” He tells her she’s perfect for him, arguing that she can give up her career because her last two movies were ”real dogs” and that the only negative he can see to their being a couple is her age (the same as his own). When Jane first succumbs to his charms, he yells, ”Hot dog!”<\/p>\n

In the beginning, he cheats on her. He calls it ”a tic” and has a Freudian block against the word ”monogamous,” always saying ”magnanimous” instead. When Jane realizes he’s had a nooner in his office, she begins hitting him around the head and shoulders with the car phone — ”Simultaneously, part of me was thinking that I’d never seen anyone do this in a movie and what a good scene it would make,” she writes wryly — and pours bottled water on him.<\/p>\n

In the end, he cheats on her and stifles her, not wanting her to do anything that takes her from his side, even going into a rage when she wants to visit her daughter, who is having a baby. The man who once ridiculed his ash-stained employees on Ash Wednesday as ”Jesus freaks” and called Christianity ”a religion for losers” was also, of course, hostile to ”anything metaphysical.”<\/p>\n

She moves into her daughter’s guest room in Atlanta: ”I had gone from 23 kingdom-size properties and a private plane that could sleep six to a small guest room with no closet in a modest house in a charming but not quite gentrified section of Atlanta.”<\/p>\n

She has her breast implants taken out, embraces Christianity and feminism, gives up drinking and becomes ”pregnant with myself.”<\/p>\n

”The failures are what deliver us to ourselves,” she concludes. ”You don’t get Real by playing it safe.”<\/p>\n

If only Henry Fonda had been a hugger.<\/p>\n

Maureen Dowd, the author of ”Bushworld,” is an Op-Ed columnist for The Times.<\/p>\n

\"image\"<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MAUREEN DOWD has written a funny review of Jane Fonda\u2019s autobiography in today\u2019s NYT. \u2018My Life So Far\u2019: The Roles of a Lifetime One day [Read More]<\/a> \"image\" \"image\" \"image\"<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4344","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-humor","category-people"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peter.murmann.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4344","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peter.murmann.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peter.murmann.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peter.murmann.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peter.murmann.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4344"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/peter.murmann.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4344\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5406,"href":"https:\/\/peter.murmann.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4344\/revisions\/5406"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peter.murmann.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4344"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peter.murmann.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4344"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peter.murmann.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4344"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}